General Employment Law

Le v. Triza Electrical Corp., and Chris Triantafillou, individually and Abdessamad Elhaddad, individually,Civil Case No.: 19-cv-05134

New Action filed in the Eastern District of New York

Le v. Triza Electrical Corp., and Chris Triantafillou, individually and Abdessamad Elhaddad, individually,
Civil Case No.: 19-cv-05134

On September 9, 2019, Plaintiff Le filed a lawsuit in the United States Eastern District Court of New York against TRIZA ELECTRICAL CORP., and CHRIS TRIANTAFILLOU, individually, and ABDESSAMAD ELHADDAD, individually, (collectively as “Defendants”), alleging as follows:

Plaintiff, who is Vietnamese, worked for Defendants – – a Queens-based electrical contracting company, its Chief Executive Officer and day-to-day overseer, and the company’s foreman who was Plaintiff’s direct supervisor – – as an electrician from approximately January 2016 until in or around February 1, 2018.  As is relevant herein, from January 1, 2017 until the end of his employment in or around February 1, 2018 (“the Relevant Time Period”), Defendants failed to pay Plaintiff the wages lawfully due to him under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), and the N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. (“NYCRR”).  Specifically, during the Relevant Time Period, Defendants required Plaintiff to work, and Plaintiff did in fact work, in excess of forty hours each week or virtually every week, yet these Defendants failed to compensate Plaintiff at the rate of one and one-half times his regular rate of pay for all hours that Plaintiff worked in excess of forty in a week.  Instead, Defendants paid Plaintiff a flat weekly wage that operated to cover only the first forty hours that he worked in a week, and thus Defendants failed to compensate Plaintiff at any rate of pay, let alone at the statutorily-required overtime rate of one and one-half times his regular rate of pay for any hours that Plaintiff worked in excess of forty in a week, in violation of the FLSA, the NYLL, and the NYCRR.

If any individual is or has previously been an employee of the Defendants named in the lawsuit and/or has information that may be relevant to this case, please contact Borrelli & Associates, P.L.L.C. as soon as possible through one of our websites,www.employmentlawyernewyork.com or www.516abogado.com, or any of our phone numbers: (516) 248–5550, (516) ABOGADO, or (212) 679–5000.

Published by
Borrelli & Associates

Recent Posts

Overtime Draft

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently faced a significant legal setback as a federal…

1 day ago

When Not to Sign a Severance Agreement

If you’ve been offered a severance agreement, chances are you’re dealing with a challenging situation.…

1 day ago

Firm Secures Judgment in the amount of $150,000.00 – Wage & Hour Violations

May 2024 Valdez et al. v. Michpat & Fam, LLC d/b/a Dairy Queen Grill &…

3 days ago

Nance v. The City of New York; Index No.:24-cv-8228

New Action filed in the United States District Court Southern District of New York On…

5 days ago

Can You Be Terminated While on Workers’ Compensation

Workers’ compensation is designed to protect employees who are injured on the job. It provides…

4 weeks ago

Firm Secures Judgment in the amount of $150,000.00 – Wage & Hour Violations

January 2024 Hiciano et al. v. Joyeria Elizabeth I, Corp., et al. Docket No: 21-cv-4508…

4 weeks ago