New Collective Action filed in the Eastern District of New York
Lopez v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. and 1-800-Flowers Team Services, Inc.Docket No.: 17-cv-05110
On August 30, 2017, Lead Plaintiff Lopez, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, filed a class and collective action lawsuit in United States District Court – Eastern District of New York against 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. and 1-800-Flowers Team Services, Inc. The complaint alleges as follows: Plaintiff worked for Defendants at their Carle Place, New York location as an analyst from April 8, 2013, until she resigned on August 8, 2017. Throughout her employment, 1-800-Flowers required Plaintiff to work, and Plaintiff did work, five days per week, starting her workday at approximately 9:00 a.m. and ending at approximately 6:00 p.m., while rarely providing her with an uninterrupted break during each workday. Thus, by approximation, 1-800-Flowers required Plaintiff to work, and Plaintiff did work, approximately forty-five hours per week. Each hour that Plaintiff, FLSA Plaintiffs, and Rule 23 Plaintiffs worked was for Defendants’ benefit. Defendants did not pay Plaintiff at any rate of pay for any hours that she worked in a week in excess of forty.
If any person worked for the defendants named in the lawsuit during the time period of Tuesday, August 30, 2011- present or has information that may be relevant to this case, contact Borrelli & Associates, P.L.L.C. as soon as possible through our website, www.employmentlawyernewyork.com, or by phone: (516) 248-5550, (516) ABOGADO, and (212) 679-5000.
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently faced a significant legal setback as a federal…
If you’ve been offered a severance agreement, chances are you’re dealing with a challenging situation.…
May 2024 Valdez et al. v. Michpat & Fam, LLC d/b/a Dairy Queen Grill &…
New Action filed in the United States District Court Southern District of New York On…
Workers’ compensation is designed to protect employees who are injured on the job. It provides…
January 2024 Hiciano et al. v. Joyeria Elizabeth I, Corp., et al. Docket No: 21-cv-4508…