Drug Testing
The significance of the MRTA arises from the amending of Section 201-D, or the New York Lawful Activities Law, of the New York Labor Law to establish that as long as cannabis is used in accordance with New York State Law, it renders it a legally consumable product. As such, New York employers may not refuse to hire, employ, discharge, or discriminate against someone who uses cannabis lawfully while off-duty, off-premises, and while not using the employer’s equipment or other property. This inherently renders drug testing for cannabis impossible. However, employers may test for cannabis if an employee shows “articulable symptoms of impairment.” The guidance later handicaps that idea by stating that if the employer tests positive for marijuana, the employer may not take adverse employment actions against that employee. However, employers are not prohibited from using disciplinary actions against employees found to be using cannabis during work hours or while using the employer’s property. It is paramount to note that these prohibitions do not apply to drug testing mandated through federal law, meaning, for example, that drug testing required for a federal contract is still permitted.
Permitted Employer Actions
While the aforementioned seem all-consuming, that is far from the reality. The newly amended New York Lawful Activities Law added a brand-new subsection, Subsection 4-a, which provides that employers are free to take adverse employment actions or outright prohibit employee conduct where:
Moreover, employers may prohibit cannabis use during “work hours,” including paid and unpaid breaks and meal periods, even if the employee temporarily leaves the worksite and when the employee is on-call or “expected to be engaged in work.”
What Does “Articulable Symptoms of Impairment” Mean
Despite mentioning “specific articulable symptoms of impairment” numerous times, the amended New York Lawful Activities Law fails to provide a complete and dispositive list of symptoms of impairments. In fact, even the smell of cannabis, on its own, is not considered evidence of an articulable symptom of impairment. Instead, articulable symptoms are described as objectively observable indications that the employee’s performance of their essential duties is decreased or lessened. However, employers should be aware that what they may deem to be articulable symptoms of impairment may also be a sign of an employee’s disability, which is protected under federal and state law through the New York State Human Rights Law.
If you feel your employer has discriminated against you for your use of cannabis while you are off-duty, off-premises, and while not using the employer’s equipment or other property, contact Borrelli & Associates, P.L.L.C., to schedule a free consultation through one of our websites, www.employmentlawyernewyork.com, www.516abogado.com, or any of our phone numbers: (516) 248-5550, (516) ABOGADO, or (212) 679-5000.
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently faced a significant legal setback as a federal…
If you’ve been offered a severance agreement, chances are you’re dealing with a challenging situation.…
May 2024 Valdez et al. v. Michpat & Fam, LLC d/b/a Dairy Queen Grill &…
New Action filed in the United States District Court Southern District of New York On…
Workers’ compensation is designed to protect employees who are injured on the job. It provides…
January 2024 Hiciano et al. v. Joyeria Elizabeth I, Corp., et al. Docket No: 21-cv-4508…